'The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012: Reflection Paper\r'

'A few weeks ago, the unsophisticated was blow extinct of the water due to the sudden implementation of RA 1015 or the Cybercrime stripe lay out of 2012. I seldom look upon the news but I found out to the highest degree the right after my mom warned me to be c arful of what I post on pass. I was impress because my mom has never told me that earlier. I figured it wasn’t much of a abundant deal so I shrugged off my mom’s warning. However, as the news about the prick began to spread, a pass on of large number started to express their opposition to the newly-implemented justness. I began to fulfil that this act was actually a really big deal.I was astounded after reading some explanations as to why the bill shouldn’t be implemented. why would the government pass a law that hampers state? How come all one senator noticed the flaws and loopholes of the bill? I saw a post as to why Senator TG Guingona opposed the said law. First of all, the alimenta tion in the law are vague and unclear. nigh anyone can be liable and be charged with crime. Second, the punishment is too grave and unfair. A 12-year denounce? That’s too much. Third, it’s oppressive. You can be charged with two counts of libel, one under the revise Penal Code and the second under the Cybercrime Pr dismantletion Act.As a student, this law gravely affects me. We all inhabit that many adolescents are very active on the cyberspace. I’m an active netizen as salubrious and because some of the provisions on the law are vague and unclear, I could be charged with crime, even if I just retweet, like or function posts containing criticisms. Second, isn’t a basic human honest to be able to express one’s self freely? The Philippines is a democratic country and this law simply curtails freedom of expression. However, the Cybercrime Prevention Act is not all that bad. It’s actually comfortably that we finally have a law that aims to disallow cyber crime in the country.After several cases of unsolved internet crimes (resulting to online criminals not being penalized for their crimes), it’s about clipping that we have a law for this issue. Its objective is to shelter netizens from becoming victims of online crimes but because of certain provisions, the bill becomes an hindrance for freedom of speech. Another good thing about the bill is the establishment of a Cybercrime Investigation and Coordination Center. It ordain enable qualified officials to go after people who commit online crimes and file a case against them. The argue views of the act are those against it and those who are in regard of the bill. in that location are also those who believe that we need this law but don’t agree on certain provisions stated in the law. Yes, we do need a Cybercrime Prevention honor but the problem with this bill is that it lacks or is obscure in certain areas. It’s not perfect and it necessi tate to be improved. It may even be shell to misunderstanding and abuse due to the vagueness of the provisions. If I had the might to reconcile these opposing views, I would first comprehend out everyone’s perspective regarding this bill. This would allow me to chicane what necessary changes should be made to the law.The bottom line is, the bill needs to be revised. A law has to be clear and specific before it is passed and implemented. The only way to fix this issue is to improve and gain ground the law better. Certain areas need to be changed and the changes to be made must be acceptable for all, especially the citizens. We cannot deny that the internet has had a huge electrical shock on our daily lives. It is a symbol of mankind’s advancement and development. It is a vast seeded player of data and information. It has allowed people to communicate with individuals who are remote away from them.It empowers people because it is an outlet and platform for us to speak our minds and express our opinions. In more ship canal than one, it has improved our lives and made it easier. Although it is a valuable explore and learning tool, we also cannot contradict that there are individuals who exploit the freedom they have on the internet. There is a need for a Cybercrime Prevention Law because the internet can also be utilise to commit crimes. However, individuals should also practice being accountable of what they say and do online. Like what my professor said, it’s a matter of personal responsibility. Think before you post.\r\n'